Foreign Visitors Should Pay More Than Local Visitors for Cultural and Historical Attractions.

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

The affair in the question booklet whether or not is generating a huge controversy lately. Tourists should pay more money to visit cultural and historical places than local residents. Some people strongly support it while others do not. Before documenting any conclusion, both sides of this issue will be discussed elaborately.
There are a number of strong factors which compel one to go for this issue. For a start, if the foreign visitors pay more for a cultural and historical attraction, it will help to increase more income for a country. Further, gathering more money, government can provide more service and improve the facilities for tourist. Moreover, they can educate local people about the attraction by hiring as tourist guides to assist visitors to convince them about attraction of culture and history of a country.

There are, on the other hand, reasons why people think this issue from different point of view. To begin with, if government increases ticket price for tourists, the number of tourists may decrease. As a result, this situation affects the country's economy. For example, in Bangladesh, every year a lot of foreigners come to Bangladesh to visit Cox’s Bazar which is very important place for this country and earn huge money from this. Besides, the tourists introduce a country to the whole world. Therefore, many tourism agents criticize governments because of this.
In conclusion, I would like to state my opinion that I am against the statement. I think what I have stated in this essay emphasize this point and requires no more discussion.