Pool Full of Jello

The death penalty is a very big issue when it comes to politics, human rights, and just being a human with humanistic emotions with the thought of having to take another human‘s life, but the movie “Dead Man Walking”underline movie titles tries to sway it’s viewers toward the pro side of the death penalty.this sentence is really wordy—what do you think you could do to revise it? Although “Dead Man Walking” does show the other side of the situation and shows the con sides to the death penalty, butdelete the movie and the creators for the most part point out that the death penalty is necessary for certain crimes committed.

Throughout the movie it was established that there was a direct link between the double homicide rape and Matthew Poncelet, but the movie kept the audience thinking that Poncelet didn’t actually kill either of the people, he just so happened to be “in the wrong place at the wrong time.” Which instilled a, somewhat,no commas here sympathy factor for Poncelet and brought up the question “Should Matthew Poncelet be killed for the crimes that he committed?” The answer is yes. Although the case was very sketchy from the start, since Poncelet was directly involved in the double homicide rape and had no significant evidence that his affiliate, Carl Vitello, committed both of the murders without the knowing aid of Matthew Poncelet, then Matthew Poncelet needed to be put to death for the two deaths of a woman and man at their prime, and for the emotional heartache and trauma that the victim’s parents and family were put through, because of the loss, due to the merciless, gruesome, and brutal murders, of their children Hope Percy and Walter Delacroix. A really long sentence!   You do a pretty good job of controlling it, but it would be better if it was two, maybe three sentences.

In the movie “Dead Man Walking” there was plenty of