Words of Wisdom:

"My teacher's long and boresome speech adds my character." " - Tigris

Exception to Stare Decisis

  1. Relevance Of The Common Law Doctrine Of Stare Decisis (Judicial Precedent) To The Shari’Ah Court System In Nigeria
    country. Particularly as an offshoot of that influence, the common law doctrine of stare decisis, translated as judicial precedent or simply as precedent,1 has come...
  2. Differentiate Common Law From Civil Law Systems Emphasizing On The Following Points: Sources Of Law, Principle...
    the civil law system doesnt recognize the existence of the doctrine of stare decisis, thus judicial pronouncement are not binding on lower courts or subsequent nor...
  3. Are Judges The Makers Or Discoverers Of The Law?: Theories Of Adjudication And Stare Decisis With
    1974), at 43943; Peter Wesely-Smith, Theories of Adjudication and the Status of Stare Decisis, in L. Goldstein (ed), Precedent in Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press...
Date Submitted:
09/23/2011 09:47 PM
Flesch-Kincaid Score:
35.9 
Words:
380
Essay Grade:
no grades
Flag
Join Now!

Already a Member? Login Now

Exception to Stare Decisis
1) Distinguished Precedents
2) Per Incuriam Precedents
3) Persuasive or Non-Binding precedent
4) Overruled Precedents

Distinguished Precedents – A judge may refuse to be bound by a precedent, when he is manages to distinguish the precedent after finding material differences between the previous cases than his present case and the previous case that laid down the precedent which is about another area of law and the judge denies an analogy.
This is where the judge satisfies himself that even if he had decided the precedent case and had decided similarly to the actual precedent decision. He has to go together with the logic and not forced to make another decision as he likes to do now. For example, because it turns out that the facts of the cases are significantly different. In addition, a judgment which had been decided Per Incuriam does not have to be followed as precedent because Per Incuriam literally translated as ‘through want of care’, Per Incuriam refers to a judgment of a court which has been decided without reference to a statutory provision or earlier decision which would have been relevant and binding. The significance of a judgment having been decided Per Incuriam is that it does not then have to be followed as precedent. Despite of it judgement is a rare exception. The lower courts are free to depart from an earlier judgment of a superior court where that earlier judgment was decided Per Incuriam.

Per Incuriam Precedents – this refer to decisions made where some relevant statutory provision or precedent had been brought to the court’s attention. Among the reason to use judicial precedent is to ensure consistency of decisions, certainty and uniformity. Sometimes, legislation or statutes does not contain all the information needed to be clarified or interpret. This is when the judicial decision is made and it became authoritative.
Persuasive Precedents – Decision of superior courts which have been regarded as...
Join Now to View the Full Essay

Comments

Express your owns thoughts and ideas on this essay by writing a grade and/or critique.

  1. No comments