As we know very well, governments of different nations are heavily involved in scientific and research activities and interfere in them on a regular basis. One point of view in relation to this issue is that governments should impose very few limitations and constraints on scientific activities leading to scientific headway. I completely and emphatically concur with this highly controversial, contentious and divisive point of view. In the developmental section of this hastily-arranged essay, I will provide and expatiate on two cogent, compelling and potent reasons and a couple of associated points in order to cast light on and explain my stance vis-à-vis the foregoing perspective.
As pointed out unequivocally and transparently in the preceding paragraph, I go along with the point of view under discussion. There are two enormously significant and compelling reasons buttressing my viewpoint. First, as epistemologists have noted time and again, the very nature of knowledge is such that it cannot grow and flourish adequately in restrictive and closed settings. In fact, as epistemologists have suggested, human knowledge gets stunted and hamstrung if political, governmental, financial, religious and ethical restrictions are imposed on it by different individuals and organizations. In Cuba, for instance, there has been a trickle of scientific progress in different domains since the catastrophic revolution of Communist fighters and the imposition of Communist restrictions on science. Second, I firmly and unshakably believe that governments and other powerful political institutions should not interfere in any scientific activity and deal with the affairs and issues which are within their remit of power. In fact, I regard governments as...
No comments