Consumer society gives us choice. Discuss this claim
Introduction
Describe what consumer society is and what it means
Main body of the essay
Paragraph 2
Outline Bauman's argument using his set of concepts - 'the seduced' and 'the repressed' - and show how they help to organise and structure the following claims.
Claims:
• Divisions in a consumer society are determined by access to consumption and the ability to use consumption to shape one's identity
• Membership and belonging in a consumer society is defined by the ability to spend, by car ownership and mobility
• Exclusion from consumer society is defined by the inability to consume effectively and a lack of belonging
Paragraph 3
Present the evidence to support Bauman's argument.
Evidence:
• Peter Jackson's study of retail parks
NB: Do I need more evidence here? One piece of evidence to support these claims doesn't seem to be enough. Perhaps I need to support these claims with some examples of who the seduced and repressed might be?
Paragraph 4
Outline the argument that supermarkets produce a divided society. Note the two sides of the argument here using the two claims below and use the concepts 'zero-sum power' and 'positive-sum power' to explain these two positions.
Claims:
• Large supermarkets abuse their dominant position in the market at the expense of consumers, local shops and vulnerable workers
• Large supermarkets use their dominant position to provide choice to consumers and benefits to workers and the wider community
Paragraph 5
Use the evidence below to support the two opposing claims.
Evidence:
• Partick/Linwood examples
• statistics detailing the supermarkets' market share
• statistics from the Federation of Small Businesses
NB: Is there too much evidence here? One piece of evidence per claim is probably sufficient?
No comments