Words of Wisdom:

"Grammar mistakes show the creative ability of man kind" - Tigris

Consumer Protection

  • Date Submitted: 07/23/2012 06:05 AM
  • Flesch-Kincaid Score: 50.7 
  • Words: 1053
  • Essay Grade: no grades
  • Report this Essay
Consumer Protection Council vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 13 March, 2012

Madras High Court
Madras High Court
Consumer Protection Council vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 13 March, 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13/03/2012
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH
WRIT PETITION (MD) No.11974 OF 2011
Consumer Protection Council
Represented by its Secretary,
D53, 2nd Floor, Red Star Annexe,
Thillainagar Main Road,
Tiruchirappalli - 620 018. ... Petitioner
vs.
1.National Highways Authority of India,
Rep. by its Chairman,
Dwarka,
New Delhi - 110 075.
2.The Chief General Manager,
National Highways Authority of India,
Chennai - 600 034.
3.The Divisional Railway Manager,
Southern Railways,
Trichy Division,
Tiruchirappalli - 1.
4.The Commissioner,
Tiruchirappalli City Municipal Corporation, Tiruchirappalli - I. .. Respondents
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/80718831/

1

Consumer Protection Council vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 13 March, 2012

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the
first and second respondents to expeditiously implement their expression of willingness in communication
bearing No.NHAI/PD/Try/NH-A4/VIC/2008/1738 dated 25.8.2008 for construction of an underpass at the G
corner junction to facilitate access to vehicles from the Trichy side of the four lane Highway to Golden Rock
in Tiruchirappalli.
!For petitioner ... Mr.G.R.Swaminathan ^For respondents 1 and 2 ... Mr.C.Arul Vadivel Sekar Asst.Solicitor
General of
India
For 3rd respondent ... Mr.S.Manohar For 4th respondent ... Mr.P.Srinivas
:ORDER
(Order of the Court was made
by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J)
The present Writ Petition is a public interest litigation at the instance of the Consumer Protection Council,
Tiruchirappalli, for a Mandamus to direct the first and...

Comments

Express your owns thoughts and ideas on this essay by writing a grade and/or critique.

  1. No comments