SECOND AMENDMENT:
What Role Should The Government Play in Gun Control?
A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right...
the reasons behind the gun control efforts, it would be good to view the history of our country, and the role firearms have played in it. The second amendment to...
bear arms.
In addition to giving a look at the role courts can and do play in politics, the gun control debate demonstrates some of the effects of interest...
to bear arms.
In addition to giving a look at the role courts can and do play in politics, the gun control debate demonstrates some of the effects of interest...
almost any major city, which could also lead to the federal government passing more gun control laws.
In Georgia, pro-gun forces scored a victory when Governor Roy...
What Role Should The Government Play in Gun Control?
A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.
Gun control is a real issue with Americans today. Many people have different opinions about how to handle our growing dilemma concerning guns. There are those who believe we should ban guns altogether and those who believe we should not ban or restrict the people’s right to own guns at all. Both sides have valid arguments, but neither side seems to know how to compromise because of their very different opinions. I personally believe guns should be banned. However, those against gun control have very good arguments.
The Second Amendment was written because of the colonists’ fear of an all-powerful central government taking over, but there are many interpretations of how the Second Amendment reads. The court has never found the Second Amendment to clash with the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process clause which states that, “No state shall...deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” (McClenaghan 522). This gave each state the right to set up their own rules and regulations, which I believe, is one reason why we have the problems that we do.
There have been four major cases heard by the Supreme Court which found that the fire-arm control laws are constitutional; United States v. Cruikshank (1986), Presser v. Illinois (1886), Miller v. Texas (1894), and the United States v. Miller (1939) (Strahinich 41). United States v. Miller was the most important. It supported a section of the National Firearms Act of 1934, basically stating that it is a crime to ship sawed off shotguns, machine guns, or silencers across state lines unless registered with the Treasury Department (McClenaghan 522).
The United States already has more than twenty thousand gun laws, but they do...
No comments