Words of Wisdom:

"If you deserve to win something but don't, then whoever -did- win obviously cheated." - Philipk31

Adverse

  • Date Submitted: 10/29/2012 12:39 PM
  • Flesch-Kincaid Score: 58.7 
  • Words: 7087
  • Essay Grade: no grades
  • Report this Essay
LIST OF AUTHORITIES

    ➢ A.K. Karaipak v. Union of India AIR 1970 SC 150:,, 
    ➢ Cooper v. Wandsworth Board (1861-73) All ER Rep 1554.,
    ➢ Dr. Bonham's Case (1610) 
    ➢ Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT
    ➢ E P Royappa v. State of Tamilnadu AIR, 1974 SC 555. ,
    ➢ Fiehe v. R.E. Householder Co., 125 So. 2, 7 (Fla. 1929).
    ➢ Govt. of Mysore v. J V Bhat, (1975) 1 SCC 10
    ➢ Govindsingh v. Subbarao, AIR 1971 Guj 131
    ➢ Gabriel vs. State of Madras, (1959 2 M.L.J. 15)
    ➢ Hiranath mishra v. Rajendra medical Coll AIR 1973 SC 1260, 
    ➢ Khem Chand Vs. Union of India AIR 1958 S.C. 300
    ➢ Keshav mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1973 SC 389,
    ➢ Kazubowski v. Kazubowski, 
    ➢ Mukhtiar Singh Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1957 ALL. 297,
    ➢ Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597
    ➢ Mineral Development v. State of Bihar AIR 1960 SC 468
    ➢ M.S. Gill   Vs. Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405
    ➢ Mayor of Baltimore vs. Scharf 54 Md. 499, 519 (1880)
    ➢ Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpn. (1985) 3 SCC 545
    ➢ Province of Bombay v Madhukar, AIR 1952 Bom. 37
    ➢ Pettit v. Penn., La.App., 180 So.2d 66, 69
    ➢ R. v. Sussex Justices, ex p. McCarthy, (1924) 1 KB 256, 259.
    ➢ R. S. Dass v. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 593,
    ➢ Russell v. duke of Norfolk, (1949) All ER 109.
    ➢ Ridge v. Baldwin (1964) AC 40, CASES, I, 475-479.,
    ➢ Raj Kishore Prasad Jaiswal v Subak Narain, AIR 1959 SC 1078
    ➢ State of J & K v. Bakshii Ghulam AIR 1967 SC 122 
    ➢ State v. Green, 232 S.W.2d 897, 903 (Mo. 1950).
    ➢ Shaughnessy v. United States 345 US 206 (1953).
    ➢ Syndicate Bank v. General Secretary,(2000) 5 SCC 65
    ➢ Union of India v. J P Mitter AIR 1971 SC 1093.
    ➢ Vaughn v. State, 3 Tenn.Crim.App. 54, 456 S.W.2d 879, 883.
    ➢ Vionet v Barrett




“The principles of natural justice are easy to proclaim but their precise extent is far less easy to define”...

Comments

Express your owns thoughts and ideas on this essay by writing a grade and/or critique.

  1. No comments