THE DEATH OF SOCRATES
An
of the Platonic Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito and Phaedo
Interpretation
by
ROMANO GUARDINI
Translated from the
German
by
BASIL
WRIGHTON
LONDON SHEED & WARD
1948
FIRST PUBLISHED 194S BY SHEED AND WARD, LTD,
110/111 FLEET STREET
LONDON,
E.C.4
book is copyright. No portion of it be reproduced without written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to the publishers.
This
may
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY PURNELL AND SONS, LTD.
PAULTON (SOMERSET) AND LONDON
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
THE FATE of
Socrates is one of the principal themes in the history of the western mind. Whatever might be the paths of philosophical reflection from the year 399 B.C., they must lead back sooner or later to that enigmatic figure which so deeply touches all who come in contact with it. Socrates is not a systematic philosopher, yet he tells us more about the meaning of philosophy than many systematic writings. He is inimitable, yet he has had a deeper influence on men's minds than most others who have taught a way of life. There is in his fate, which is so completely the result of a given situation and so intimately bound up with his personal idiosyncrasy, a typical
significance
which scarcely any other historical figure possesses. personality admits of what is called contact in such a degree. This requires a character which is not simply equivalent with greatness of mind or human lovableness. A man may have admirable qualities, but of such a kind that they raise a barrier between him and those who would approach him. Another has the greatest influence, but only through his achievements, while he himself, personally, remains in the background. Again there are characters which captivate people, but are of no significance beyond that. "Contact" means the meeting with an historical figure which is unmistakably
No comments