Words of Wisdom:

"Doing The Right Thing Is More Important Than Doing The Thing Right!" - DemajhSals

Critically Examine the Proposition That the Ruling Handed Down by the European Court of Justice in Google France Strikes an Appropriate Balance Between the Interests of Trade Mark Owners, Competitors and Consumers.

  • Date Submitted: 03/03/2011 10:36 AM
  • Flesch-Kincaid Score: 53.3 
  • Words: 5291
  • Essay Grade: no grades
  • Report this Essay
Contents                                                                                   Page

(a). Table of Statutes, Statutory Instruments, European and
International materials                                                                                       2

(b). Table of Cases                                                                                             3

(c). Google France                                                                                         4-5

(d). Rescuecom, BergSpecthe, ACCC, Consim                                             5-7

(e). Google’s Policy                                                                                         7-8

(f). Article 5 and Article 9                                                                                 8-9

(g). Confusion                                                                                               9-11

(h). Interflora                                                                                                     12

(i). Conclusion                                                                                                   12

(j). Bibliography                                                                                           13-18

(a).Table of Statutes, Statutory Instruments, European and International Materials.

1. Article 85(1) Treaty of Rome 1973

2.   Sale of Goods Act 1979 s 2(1), chapter 54, part II.

3.   Article 5(1),(a),(b), 5(2) First Council Directive 89/104/EEC, 21 December 1988.

4. Lanham (Trademark) Act 1946, s.45, subchapter III. (USA)

5. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s53, s85(d). (Australia)

6. Trademark Act 1999, s29. (India)

7. Theft (Amendment) Act 1996, s1(1), s4(1).

8.   Treaty of Lisbon 2007.

9. Article 7(2) Directive 89/104.

10. Article 9(1),(a),(b) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 of the Community Trade Mark.

11. Article 25 Anti-Counterfeiting...

Comments

Express your owns thoughts and ideas on this essay by writing a grade and/or critique.

  1. No comments